Organized Retail Theft Defense
An organized retail theft charge can turn what feels like a shoplifting accusation into a felony. You deserve a clear explanation of the difference and a careful look at the evidence before you decide anything.
We can help. Nova Law Group was built by a former Maricopa County Attorney’s Office felony prosecutor. We prepare every case as if it is going to trial, and we take a meticulous, aggressive approach, fighting from every angle, because the report is only one side of the story.
Talk to us before you talk to anyone else. Call (480) 405-6767. Consultations are free and confidential, and the earlier we are involved, the more we can do.
At a glance
- The law: A.R.S. § 13-1819 covers removing merchandise from a store without paying, with intent to resell or trade it, or using an artifice, instrument, container, device or other article to help remove merchandise without paying.
- How it is classified: A class 4 felony under § 13-1819(B), whatever the value of the merchandise.
- Possible sentence (first offense): 1 to 3.75 years in prison, or probation if the court finds you eligible.
- Where the case is heard: Maricopa County Superior Court, in the downtown Phoenix criminal court complex. Confirm the building on your current notice. A misdemeanor shoplifting charge, by contrast, is heard in a city (municipal) court or a justice court, depending on where it happened.
- What to do now: Do not discuss the incident with store staff or police until you have talked with a lawyer, and keep any receipts or messages.
What the law says
Under § 13-1819(A), a person commits organized retail theft if the person, "acting alone or in conjunction with another person," does either of the following:
- Removes merchandise from a retail establishment without paying the purchase price "with the intent to resell or trade the merchandise for money or for other value" (§ 13-1819(A)(1)).
- Uses "an artifice, instrument, container, device or other article" to facilitate removing merchandise from a retail establishment without paying (§ 13-1819(A)(2)).
Despite the name, the statute does not require a group or a theft ring. One person acting alone can be charged. It also has no dollar threshold, so the value of the merchandise does not decide whether the charge applies.
The first form turns on your purpose: intent to resell or trade. The second form turns on your method. The State might point to something like a bag altered to defeat security sensors or a tool used to remove security tags, but whether an item qualifies depends on how it was used.
How it is classified
Organized retail theft is a single class 4 felony. The same conduct often overlaps with shoplifting under A.R.S. § 13-1805, which is classified by value, method and history:
| Charge | Circumstance | Class |
|---|---|---|
| Shoplifting, § 13-1805(H) | Value under $1,000 (a firearm under $1,000 is a class 6 felony) | Class 1 misdemeanor |
| Shoplifting, § 13-1805(H) | $1,000 or more but less than $2,000 | Class 6 felony |
| Shoplifting, § 13-1805(H) | $2,000 or more; a continuing criminal episode (property worth $1,500 or more taken in at least three incidents within 90 consecutive days); or to assist a criminal street gang or criminal syndicate | Class 5 felony |
| Shoplifting, § 13-1805(I) | Using an artifice, instrument, container, device or other article, or shoplifting with two or more qualifying prior offenses within five years | Class 4 felony |
| Organized retail theft, § 13-1819 | Intent to resell or trade, or use of an artifice or device | Class 4 felony |
The difference from ordinary shoplifting is the purpose (resale or trade) or the method (an artifice or device). For more on shoplifting tiers, see our A.R.S. § 13-1805 shoplifting page.
Possible penalties
For a first felony offense that is not dangerous, A.R.S. § 13-702(D) sets a class 4 range of 1 year mitigated, 2.5 years presumptive and 3.75 years aggravated. If you are eligible, A.R.S. § 13-901(A) allows the court to suspend the sentence and place you on probation, which can last up to four years for a class 4 felony under A.R.S. § 13-902(A).
The court must also order restitution "in the full amount of the economic loss" under A.R.S. § 13-603(C), and a felony fine can reach $150,000 under A.R.S. § 13-801(A). In some cases diversion may be possible. A.R.S. § 11-361 describes a county attorney program that "may divert or defer" a prosecution before a plea or trial.
Most state felonies in Maricopa County are prosecuted by the Maricopa County Attorney's Office. Some retail theft cases are prosecuted by the Arizona Attorney General's Office, often where the conduct crosses county lines or a state agency investigated. We handle these matters whichever office brought the charge.
Consequences beyond the sentence
- Record: Organized retail theft is a felony record. A set-aside under A.R.S. § 13-905 sets aside the judgment of guilt. Under A.R.S. § 13-911(E)(2), you may petition to seal a class 4 felony record five years after completing your sentence. See record sealing and set-asides.
- Future charges: Under § 13-1805(I), a prior organized retail theft counts toward the two prior offenses within five years that can make a later shoplifting a class 4 felony.
- Firearms: A felony conviction makes you a prohibited possessor under A.R.S. § 13-3101(A)(7)(b), and 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) adds a federal bar.
- Immigration: Theft offenses can carry consequences under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2). If you are not a U.S. citizen, talk to an immigration lawyer before you accept any plea.
- Work: A retail theft conviction can affect jobs in retail, cash handling and other positions of trust.
Avoiding jail is not the same as avoiding a conviction. A probation sentence still leaves a felony theft conviction that employers and landlords can see.
How we defend organized retail theft cases
The defense usually starts with the element that turns a shoplifting case into a felony. Depending on the facts, we may focus on:
- Intent to resell or trade. No listings, no sales messages and an amount consistent with personal use can undercut that element. Without it, and without a device, the case may fit shoplifting instead.
- The artifice or device. An ordinary purse, backpack or shopping bag used in the usual way may not be an item used "to facilitate" the removal.
- Removal. The statute requires that merchandise was removed from the retail establishment. If you were stopped inside, that element may be disputed.
- Identity. Store video can be unclear, especially when several people were in the area.
- Procedure. We review how any detention, questioning, phone search or identification was handled, and whether a motion to suppress may apply.
Mitigation, such as returning merchandise, paying restitution, treatment and a clean record, may support a plea to a lower charge or a probation sentence.
Why Nova Law Group
Nova Law Group was built by Ryan Tait, a former Maricopa County Attorney’s Office felony prosecutor. The practice is criminal defense first. We keep caseloads deliberately low, which means the lawyers on your case have time to actually watch the video and read the reports line by line. We take cases to trial when trial is the right pressure. Overcharging happens, and a case that is genuinely prepared for trial changes the conversation with the prosecutor. Most criminal cases are quoted as a flat fee. Consultations are free and confidential.
Common questions
Shoplifting under § 13-1805 is classified mostly by value, and its lowest tier is a misdemeanor. Organized retail theft is a class 4 felony from the start, and it requires either intent to resell or trade, or the use of an artifice or device. The same events can sometimes be charged either way.
Yes. Section 13-1819(A) applies to a person "acting alone or in conjunction with another person." The word "organized" in the title does not add a group requirement.
Not for the class. A low dollar amount can still be charged as a class 4 felony under § 13-1819. Value does matter for restitution, and it can help show the items were for personal use.
Sometimes. Depending on the evidence and your history, a case may be resolved as shoplifting under § 13-1805 or through diversion. No outcome is certain, so it helps to review the evidence before any decision.
Sources
Arizona statutes link to the official text on azleg.gov, the Arizona State Legislature’s website. Federal law and general legal references link to Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute (LII). Laws change, so the version in effect on the date of your case controls.
Arizona law (azleg.gov)
- A.R.S. § 11-361: Definition of program
- A.R.S. § 13-603: Authorized disposition of offenders
- A.R.S. § 13-702: First time felony offenders; sentencing; definition
- A.R.S. § 13-801: Fines for felonies
- A.R.S. § 13-901: Probation
- A.R.S. § 13-902: Periods of probation; monitoring; fees
- A.R.S. § 13-905: Setting aside judgment of convicted person on discharge; application; release from disabilities; certificate of second chance
- A.R.S. § 13-911: Sealing of arrest, conviction and sentencing records; requirements; fee; appeal; definition
- A.R.S. § 13-1805: Shoplifting; detaining suspect; defense to wrongful detention; civil action by merchant; public services; classification
- A.R.S. § 13-1819: Organized retail theft; classification
- A.R.S. § 13-3101: Definitions
Cornell Legal Information Institute
Awards and ratings reflect the standards of the organizations that issue them. They do not predict the outcome of any case.
Hear What Our Clients Say
Across 67 Google reviews, plus Yelp and Avvo. These are clients’ own words, reproduced from our review profiles.
“These guys are the best attorneys in all of Arizona. It is definitely the most professional group of lawyers… I recommend this firm!”
“Sydney was extremely thorough regarding every single detail of my criminal case… it ultimately resulted in a clear and powerful win for my case.”
“They fought tirelessly for my case and helped me achieve a favorable outcome. Exceptional service and results.”
“The firm provided me with the most professional legal representation possible. Mr. Ryan Tait patiently explained… beyond my expectations.”
“The best law firm that I have ever dealt with. The amount of passion & commitment that they dedicated for my case… truly what separated them from other law firms.”
“Oh my goodness, our lawyer Ryan Tait was amazing. He does what he says he’s going to do. A very patient lawyer… He’s a miracle worker.”
“I was being charged with a few felony counts and facing a few years in prison… I made the best choice of my life calling this law firm.”
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Talk to a Maricopa County criminal defense lawyer
If you have been arrested, charged, or contacted by a detective, the decisions you make in the first few days matter. Nova Law Group defends misdemeanor and felony cases in the Superior Court and in municipal and justice courts across Maricopa County.
Free, confidential consultation: (480) 405-6767
Prefer not to call? Send us your case details and a member of our team will follow up with you.
Submitting a form or calling does not create an attorney-client relationship. Information on this page is general and is not legal advice about your case.