An old Arizona conviction follows people into background checks for jobs, apartments, professional licenses, and volunteer positions long after the sentence is over. Arizona now offers three different ways to do something about that, and they are not interchangeable. They do different things, they cover different offenses, and choosing the wrong one wastes years.
This page explains what each remedy actually does, who qualifies, and how long you have to wait. It also covers several rules that changed recently and are still often described the old way.
| Set aside A.R.S. § 13-905 | Seal A.R.S. § 13-911 | Expunge A.R.S. § 36-2862 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What happens to the judgment | Set aside; the charge is dismissed and penalties and disabilities are released | The conviction stands | Vacated |
| What happens to the record | Stays public, annotated to show it was set aside | Removed from public access; law enforcement and the courts retain access | Records expunged |
| Can you say it never happened? | No | Yes, in most settings: with important exceptions | Yes |
| Still counts as a prior? | Yes | Yes | No |
| What it covers | Most convictions, with four exclusions | Most convictions, dismissals, acquittals, and arrests with no charges: with six exclusions | Marijuana offenses only |
Arizona has no general expungement statute. That is worth stating plainly, because “expungement” is the word most people search for and it does not exist here outside of marijuana. Anyone offering to “expunge” a DUI or an assault in Arizona is using the wrong word, and possibly promising the wrong thing.
These remedies are also not mutually exclusive. A person can seek a set-aside and later seal the same record. Many people should do both.
A set-aside is available once you have fulfilled the conditions of probation or sentence and been discharged by the court. There is no waiting period beyond that discharge, and there is no filing fee.
If the court grants it, the judgment of guilt is set aside, the complaint, information, or indictment is dismissed, and you are released from the penalties and disabilities that flowed from the conviction. Three carve-outs survive: penalties imposed by the Arizona Department of Transportation, penalties imposed by the Game and Fish Commission, and any lifetime injunction.
A.R.S. § 13-905(P) lists exactly four categories of conviction that cannot be set aside:
An important correction. Driving on a suspended license and other Title 28 traffic offenses used to be a fifth exclusion. They were removed in 2021 by SB 1249 (Laws 2021, Ch. 209). Arizona attorney pages still saying traffic offenses cannot be set aside are working from a version of the statute that has been dead for years. And DUI was never on the exclusion list at all: a DUI conviction has always been set-aside eligible.
One more note for anyone researching this on their own: the subsection letter has moved. What is now § 13-905(P) was (N) in 2021 and (K) in 2020. A citation to “§ 13-905(K)” in older material points to a different provision than today’s (K).
A.R.S. § 13-905(O) provides that a set-aside restores the right to possess a firearm, except for a person convicted of a “serious offense” as that term is defined in § 13-706.
That is the Arizona answer. Whether a state set-aside also resolves a federal firearm prohibition is a genuinely unsettled question, and it is one where a confident-sounding answer from a website can get someone charged with a federal felony. If firearm rights are the reason you are pursuing relief, do not act on general information: get advice specific to your conviction before you touch a firearm.
When a set-aside is granted, the court issues a Certificate of Second Chance automatically in these situations:
The certificate is the part of Arizona’s record relief scheme that does the most practical work and gets the least attention. It lifts statutory barriers to occupational licensing under Title 32, the licenses that let people work in trades, health care, real estate, cosmetology, and dozens of other fields, and it gives employers and housing providers protection from negligent-hiring and negligent-leasing liability under A.R.S. § 12-558.03. That second piece matters more than it sounds: it removes the liability worry that causes a lot of quiet rejections.
A certificate is available only once for a felony set-aside.
Separate from a set-aside, a first-time felony offender’s civil rights are restored automatically on completion of probation or absolute discharge, provided all victim restitution has been paid. No application is required. For a person with a prior felony or unpaid restitution, restoration is discretionary on application under A.R.S. § 13-908. Firearm rights after a serious offense may be sought under A.R.S. § 13-910 after ten years, and cannot be restored after a dangerous offense.
Sealing is the newer and, for most people, the more powerful remedy. It took effect January 1, 2023. Where a set-aside annotates a record that stays public, sealing takes the case records out of public access entirely.
Section 13-911(A) opens sealing to three groups, and the second and third are the ones people overlook:
Groups two and three are not subject to the conviction waiting periods in § 13-911(E). If you were arrested and the case went away, that arrest is sitting in public records right now and it is sealable today. A very large number of people in this category have no idea the remedy exists.
| Offense class | Wait from completion of sentence |
|---|---|
| Class 2 or 3 felony | 10 years |
| Class 4, 5, or 6 felony | 5 years |
| Class 1 misdemeanor | 3 years |
| Class 2 or 3 misdemeanor | 2 years |
| Class 1 felony | Not eligible |
The clock runs from completion of the non-monetary conditions of the sentence. Money is handled separately and strictly: § 13-911(G) requires that all fines, fees, and restitution be paid in full at the time the petition is filed. An outstanding balance does not pause the clock: it blocks the filing.
Section 13-911(O) makes these ineligible for sealing:
Section 13-911(I)(5) is the operative language: a person with a sealed record may state, in all instances, that they have never been arrested for, charged with, or convicted of that offense. That is a real and broad right, and it is what makes sealing worth the wait.
It is not unlimited. The disclosure right yields for fingerprint clearance card applications, for certain jobs tied to the type of offense sealed (such as care of minors or vulnerable adults, handling money, driving, or work inside homes), for positions with law enforcement, prosecutors, courts, corrections and child welfare agencies, and wherever state or federal law requires disclosure. And § 13-911(B) keeps a sealed record usable by the State in specific ways:
That last one deserves emphasis for anyone sealing a DUI. Sealing a DUI does not make it stop counting as a prior DUI. Neither does a set-aside. A sealed 2019 DUI is still a first offense on the books when a 2027 DUI is charged, and the mandatory minimums for a second offense still apply. See our DUI defense page for what those look like.
Contrary to what at least one Arizona site claims, DUI convictions are not on the § 13-911(O) exclusion list and are generally sealable. An aggravated DUI involving a collision with serious physical injury may be caught by the dangerous-offense or serious-injury exclusions, which is a case-specific question.
SB 1639 (Laws 2024, Ch. 244), signed June 21, 2024 and effective September 14, 2024, rewrote several parts of § 13-911:
Proposition 207 created Arizona’s only true expungement, and it applies only to marijuana conduct that is now legal. Petitions have been available since July 12, 2021. Three categories qualify, and the list is exhaustive:
Three features make this remedy unusually favorable:
On a granted petition, the court sets aside the judgment of guilt, expunges the records, and restores civil rights including firearm possession.
There is a nuance worth knowing if the old charge alleged intent to sell. Arizona appellate decisions have addressed situations where possession or transport of an eligible quantity may still qualify even though a sale allegation was made. A conviction for sale, however, is not eligible at any amount. This is a place where the specific charging language on the old case controls the answer.
One caution that matters enormously and is almost never stated: if you are not a U.S. citizen, do not assume a Prop 207 expungement solves an immigration problem. Whether a vacatur under § 36-2862 removes a conviction for federal immigration purposes is unresolved, and the consequences of guessing wrong include removal. Talk to an immigration attorney before relying on it.
A domestic violence designation under A.R.S. § 13-3601 is not itself a bar to either sealing or a set-aside. Eligibility turns on the underlying offense: the assault, the criminal damage, the disorderly conduct, not on the DV tag attached to it.
What does change is the process. Section 13-911(D) requires notice to a victim who has requested postconviction notice and builds in a 60-day hold, and victims in DV cases object more often than in other case types. That is not a reason not to file. It is a reason to file with a petition that anticipates the objection.
Federal firearm consequences of a misdemeanor domestic violence conviction are a separate question governed by federal law, and Arizona record relief does not automatically resolve it. We do not publish an answer to that question because there is not a clean one. Ask about your specific conviction.
Petitions are filed in the court where the conviction was entered. The Maricopa County Superior Court publishes a self-service packet for sealing (form set CRSR1) and separate forms for set-asides and Prop 207 expungement.
The petition is not a form-filling exercise, even though it looks like one. What a judge is weighing is whether granting relief is in the interests of justice, and the petitions that succeed are the ones that actually make that case: what has changed, what the person has done since, what the relief is for, and why the public loses nothing by granting it. A bare petition with the boxes checked and nothing else is the most common reason a good candidate gets denied.
A denied sealing petition cannot be re-filed for three years under § 13-911(L). That is the strongest argument for getting the first one right.
No. Arizona has no general expungement statute. Expungement exists only for qualifying marijuana offenses under A.R.S. § 36-2862. For every other felony, the available remedies are a set-aside under § 13-905 and sealing under § 13-911, and most eligible people should pursue both.
Five years from completion of the sentence for a class 4, 5, or 6 felony, and ten years for a class 2 or 3 felony. Class 1 felonies cannot be sealed. If the case was dismissed, ended in an acquittal, or never resulted in charges after an arrest, there is no waiting period at all.
Yes to both. DUI has never been on the set-aside exclusion list, and it does not appear on the sealing exclusion list either. Two limits apply: a set-aside does not undo MVD license consequences, and neither remedy stops the DUI from counting as a prior for sentencing on a future DUI.
Not anymore. That rule was eliminated by SB 1639, effective September 14, 2024. The additional waiting period now applies only to a person who has already used sealing and then commits a new felony. The old rule is still often repeated.
In most settings, yes, A.R.S. § 13-911(I)(5) permits it. The exceptions include fingerprint clearance card applications, certain jobs tied to the type of offense sealed, positions with law enforcement, courts and corrections agencies, and any disclosure required by state or federal law. A sealed record also remains usable in a later criminal case as a prior, for impeachment, and for sentence enhancement.
Yes. Title 28 traffic offenses were removed from the set-aside exclusion list by SB 1249 in 2021. Pages saying otherwise are describing a version of the statute that has not been in effect for years.
It removes statutory barriers to occupational licensing under Title 32 and gives employers and housing providers liability protection under A.R.S. § 12-558.03. It issues automatically with a set-aside for a misdemeanor, for a class 4, 5, or 6 felony two years after discharge, or for a class 2 or 3 felony five years after discharge. It is available only once for a felony.
A denied sealing petition cannot be refiled for three years under § 13-911(L). That waiting period is the practical reason to treat the first petition as the only one you get, and to support it with more than the minimum.
Related: Sealing a record and undoing a conviction are two different things. If the goal is to challenge the conviction or the sentence itself, see post-conviction relief and appeals.
From our Google reviews, plus Yelp and Avvo. These are clients’ own words, reproduced from our review profiles.
“These guys are the best attorneys in all of Arizona. It is definitely the most professional group of lawyers… I recommend this firm!”
“Sydney was extremely thorough regarding every single detail of my criminal case… it ultimately resulted in a clear and powerful win for my case.”
“They fought tirelessly for my case and helped me achieve a favorable outcome. Exceptional service and results.”
“The firm provided me with the most professional legal representation possible. Mr. Ryan Tait patiently explained… beyond my expectations.”
“The best law firm that I have ever dealt with. The amount of passion & commitment that they dedicated for my case… truly what separated them from other law firms.”
“Oh my goodness, our lawyer Ryan Tait was amazing. He does what he says he’s going to do. A very patient lawyer… He’s a miracle worker.”
“I was being charged with a few felony counts and facing a few years in prison… I made the best choice of my life calling this law firm.”
“…they reached out to one of their attorneys and confirmed my suspicions; I’ve been worried this whole time about criminal charges, they put my fears to rest. HIGHLY recommend them.”
“Helpful and clear direction in a time of uncertainty. Highly recommended.”
“Ryan Tait was amazing and really helpful. I would recommend him.”
“If you’re looking for a law group that truly cares about you and makes a difficult situation less stressful, these are your people… Alexis was my lawyer, and she was truly heaven-sent.”
“Alexis Brooks was my lawyer… She was extremely professional yet down to earth and always made me feel at ease and confident in my case. I would definitely recommend her for anyone that needs an excellent defense attorney.”
“Spectacular representation! Sydney was very compassionate, diligent and professional. I can’t recommend enough.”
“…Ryan and his team are kind, understanding, and very good listeners. Each member of his team was well educated, knowledgable and very professional.”
“We hired Mr. Tait to handle a legal affair for a member of our family. It was a complex criminal case that required over two years of work! Through the entire effort, Mr. Tait kept us informed…”
“My family hired Ryan Tait to fight for my family member… He went over all the pros and cons. He answered all our questions and calls. He knows what he is doing.”
“Ryan is absolutely awesome and professional. He gave me all detailed advice I needed. He is nice and patient. I definitely recommend Ryan and his law firm!”
“Very good at what they do… they were always on top of everything didn’t really have to do much they took care of everything…”
“These guys are great!! They did a great job on my case, super consistent and helpful. Definitely will recommend them to anyone.”
“Excellent lawyers… and their honesty, and they helped me even though I do not live in Arizona.”
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
De nuestras reseñas en Google, además de Yelp y Avvo. Son las palabras de nuestros clientes, tomadas de nuestros perfiles de reseñas y traducidas del inglés.
“Son los mejores abogados de todo Arizona. Sin duda es el grupo de abogados más profesional… ¡Recomiendo esta firma!”
“Sydney fue sumamente minuciosa con cada detalle de mi caso penal… al final, eso resultó en una victoria clara y contundente para mi caso.”
“Lucharon incansablemente por mi caso y me ayudaron a lograr un resultado favorable. Servicio y resultados excepcionales.”
“La firma me brindó la representación legal más profesional posible. El Sr. Ryan Tait me explicó con paciencia… más allá de mis expectativas.”
“La mejor firma de abogados con la que he tratado. La pasión y el compromiso que dedicaron a mi caso… es lo que realmente los distinguió de otras firmas.”
“¡Dios mío, nuestro abogado Ryan Tait fue increíble! Cumple lo que dice que va a hacer. Un abogado muy paciente… Hace milagros.”
“Me acusaban de varios cargos por delitos graves y me enfrentaba a unos años de prisión… Tomé la mejor decisión de mi vida al llamar a esta firma.”
“…se comunicaron con uno de sus abogados y confirmaron mis sospechas; había estado preocupado todo este tiempo por posibles cargos penales, y calmaron mis temores. Los recomiendo MUCHÍSIMO.”
“Orientación útil y clara en un momento de incertidumbre. Muy recomendables.”
“Ryan Tait fue increíble y de gran ayuda. Lo recomendaría.”
“Si busca un despacho que de verdad se preocupe por usted y haga que una situación difícil sea menos estresante, esta es su gente… Alexis fue mi abogada, y fue una verdadera bendición.”
“Alexis Brooks fue mi abogada… Fue sumamente profesional y a la vez sencilla, y siempre me hizo sentir tranquilo y seguro con mi caso. Sin duda la recomendaría a cualquiera que necesite una excelente abogada defensora.”
“¡Representación espectacular! Sydney fue muy compasiva, diligente y profesional. No puedo recomendarla lo suficiente.”
“…Ryan y su equipo son amables, comprensivos y saben escuchar. Cada miembro de su equipo demostró estar bien preparado, con conocimiento y gran profesionalismo.”
“Contratamos al Sr. Tait para encargarse de un asunto legal de un miembro de nuestra familia. Fue un caso penal complejo que requirió más de dos años de trabajo. Durante todo el proceso, el Sr. Tait nos mantuvo informados…”
“Mi familia contrató a Ryan Tait para luchar por un familiar… Nos explicó todos los pros y los contras. Respondió todas nuestras preguntas y llamadas. Sabe lo que hace.”
“Ryan es absolutamente increíble y profesional. Me dio todos los consejos detallados que necesitaba. Es amable y paciente. ¡Sin duda recomiendo a Ryan y a su bufete!”
“Muy buenos en lo que hacen… siempre estuvieron al tanto de todo; casi no tuve que hacer nada, ellos se encargaron de todo…”
“¡Son excelentes! Hicieron un gran trabajo en mi caso, muy constantes y serviciales. Sin duda los recomendaré a cualquiera.”
“Excelentes abogados… y su honestidad y eso que me ayudaron que yo no vivo en Arizona”
Los resultados anteriores no garantizan un resultado similar.
If you have been arrested, charged, or contacted by a detective, the decisions you make in the first few days matter. Nova Law Group defends misdemeanor and felony cases in the Superior Court and in municipal and justice courts across Maricopa County.
Free, confidential consultation: (480) 405-6767
Prefer not to call? Send us your case details and a member of our team will follow up with you.
Maricopa County courts
Our office: Nova Law Group, PLLC, 4455 E. Camelback Rd., Suite C250, Phoenix, AZ 85018. Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., by appointment. Directions ↗
Si lo arrestaron, lo acusaron o un detective lo contactó, las decisiones que tome en los primeros días importan. Nova Law Group defiende casos de delitos menores y graves en la Corte Superior y en las cortes municipales y de justicia de todo el condado de Maricopa.
Consulta gratuita y confidencial: (480) 405-6767
¿Prefiere no llamar? Envíenos los detalles de su caso y un miembro de nuestro equipo se comunicará con usted.
Cortes del condado de Maricopa
Nuestra oficina: Nova Law Group, PLLC, 4455 E. Camelback Rd., Suite C250, Phoenix, AZ 85018. De lunes a viernes, de 8:00 a.m. a 6:00 p.m., con cita previa. Cómo llegar ↗
RecognitionReconocimientos


























Awards and ratings reflect the standards of the organizations that issue them. They do not predict the outcome of any case.Los premios y las calificaciones reflejan los criterios de las organizaciones que los otorgan. No predicen el resultado de ningún caso.