A search warrant or a call from investigators about images on a device is a shock. These cases are built on digital evidence, and we review that evidence and the law closely from the start.
We can help. Nova Law Group was built by a former Maricopa County Attorney’s Office felony prosecutor. We prepare every case as if it is going to trial, and we take a meticulous, aggressive approach, fighting from every angle, because the report is only one side of the story.
Talk to us before you talk to anyone else. Call (480) 405-6767. Consultations are free and confidential, and the earlier we are involved, the more we can do.
Under § 13-3553(A), a person commits sexual exploitation of a minor by knowingly doing any of the following:
Key definitions are in A.R.S. § 13-3551:
Two more rules matter. Under A.R.S. § 13-705(S), it is not a defense that the "minor" was a person posing as a minor or was fictitious, if the accused knew or had reason to know the purported minor was under 15. And under § 13-3553(B), depictions admitted as evidence are sealed at the end of a grand jury proceeding, hearing or trial.
| Facts alleged | Classification | Sentencing rule |
|---|---|---|
| Minor under 15, including a depiction indistinguishable from an actual minor under 15 (§ 13-705(T)(1)(b)) | Class 2 felony, dangerous crime against children | § 13-705(F), no probation, consecutive sentences |
| Minor 15 to 17 | Class 2 felony | General felony ranges in A.R.S. § 13-702 |
| Attempt or other preparatory offense, minor under 15 | Class 3 felony, second degree | § 13-705(M) |
Minor under 15. For a person who is at least 18 or tried as an adult, § 13-705(F) sets a first offense range of 10 years minimum, 17 presumptive and 24 maximum for each count. With one predicate felony, the range is 21, 28 and 35 years. Two or more predicate felonies require life under § 13-705(L). Section 13-705(K) bars probation and early release for a first degree offense.
Stacked counts. Because a "visual depiction" includes "each visual image" (§ 13-3551), a case involving many images can be charged as many counts. Under § 13-705(P), each dangerous crime against children sentence "shall be consecutive to any other sentence imposed on the person at any time." The only concurrent exception in that subsection is for sexual abuse involving one victim, so it does not reach exploitation counts. With a 10 year minimum per count, stacking can produce very long terms.
Minor 15 to 17. The offense is sentenced under § 13-702(D) as a class 2 felony. A first offense range runs from 3 years (mitigated) to 12.5 years (aggravated), with a presumptive term of 5 years.
Federal law. Similar conduct can be charged federally. Under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(b), receipt or distribution carries 5 to 20 years, and possession carries up to 10 years, or up to 20 years when an image involves a prepubescent minor or a minor under 12. Prior convictions raise these ranges. Nova Law Group appears in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. See our federal charges page.
Knowledge. The State must prove you acted knowingly. Shared devices, shared accounts, automatic downloads, cloud syncing and peer-to-peer programs can raise real questions about who put material on a device and whether anyone knew it was there.
Forensic review. We can retain an independent digital forensic examiner to review how data was extracted, where it was stored, when it was created or accessed, and whether it was ever opened.
Age and content. The State has to prove the person depicted was a minor and that the image shows exploitive exhibition or other sexual conduct as defined. Whether an image is "indistinguishable from an actual minor," and whether a depicted person was under 15, can affect both the charge and the sentence.
Searches and statements. Cases can begin with a tip from an online provider, a network investigation or a search warrant. We examine whether the warrant was supported and whether the search stayed within its scope, and we review how any statements were obtained.
Counts and mitigation. Because consecutive sentencing applies when the minor is under 15, the number and type of counts charged are a central part of the defense. Evaluations, treatment and personal history may be part of the mitigation we present.
Nova Law Group was built by Ryan Tait, a former Maricopa County Attorney’s Office felony prosecutor. The practice is criminal defense first. We keep caseloads deliberately low, which means the lawyers on your case have time to actually watch the video and read the reports line by line. We take cases to trial when trial is the right pressure. Overcharging happens, and a case that is genuinely prepared for trial changes the conversation with the prosecutor. Most criminal cases are quoted as a flat fee. Consultations are free and confidential.
Arizona's statute lists receiving and possessing, not only making or sharing. Federal law also reaches a person who "knowingly accesses with intent to view" such material under § 2252A(a)(5)(B). What you knew, and what the forensic evidence actually shows, are central questions.
It can. The definition of visual depiction in § 13-3551 includes each visual image, so a prosecutor may charge one count per image. When the minor is under 15, those sentences run consecutively under § 13-705(P).
Arizona's definitions cover images created or modified with computer software, artificial intelligence or other digital editing tools, and "minor" includes a depiction indistinguishable from an actual minor. These provisions are newer, and how they apply depends closely on the facts.
Yes. Similar conduct can be charged under federal law, including 18 U.S.C. § 2252A, and investigations sometimes involve both state and federal agencies. Federal receipt and distribution charges carry a 5 year mandatory minimum. See our federal investigations page.
Arizona statutes link to the official text on azleg.gov, the Arizona State Legislature’s website. Federal law and general legal references link to Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute (LII). Laws change, so the version in effect on the date of your case controls.












Awards and ratings reflect the standards of the organizations that issue them. They do not predict the outcome of any case.
Across 67 Google reviews, plus Yelp and Avvo. These are clients’ own words, reproduced from our review profiles.
“These guys are the best attorneys in all of Arizona. It is definitely the most professional group of lawyers… I recommend this firm!”
“Sydney was extremely thorough regarding every single detail of my criminal case… it ultimately resulted in a clear and powerful win for my case.”
“They fought tirelessly for my case and helped me achieve a favorable outcome. Exceptional service and results.”
“The firm provided me with the most professional legal representation possible. Mr. Ryan Tait patiently explained… beyond my expectations.”
“The best law firm that I have ever dealt with. The amount of passion & commitment that they dedicated for my case… truly what separated them from other law firms.”
“Oh my goodness, our lawyer Ryan Tait was amazing. He does what he says he’s going to do. A very patient lawyer… He’s a miracle worker.”
“I was being charged with a few felony counts and facing a few years in prison… I made the best choice of my life calling this law firm.”
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
If you have been arrested, charged, or contacted by a detective, the decisions you make in the first few days matter. Nova Law Group defends misdemeanor and felony cases in the Superior Court and in municipal and justice courts across Maricopa County.
Free, confidential consultation: (480) 405-6767
Prefer not to call? Send us your case details and a member of our team will follow up with you.
Submitting a form or calling does not create an attorney-client relationship. Information on this page is general and is not legal advice about your case.