A disorderly conduct charge can feel bigger than the night that caused it. A party that got loud, an argument in a parking lot or a neighbor who called the police has turned into a report with your name on it, and you are left wondering what this is going to cost you.
We can help. Nova Law Group was built by a former Maricopa County Attorney’s Office felony prosecutor. We prepare every case as if it is going to trial, and we take a meticulous, aggressive approach, fighting from every angle, because the report is only one side of the story.
Talk to us before you talk to anyone else. Call (480) 405-6767. Consultations are free and confidential, and the earlier we are involved, the more we can do.
Charged with disorderly conduct or criminal damage in Maricopa County? These charges sound minor and frequently are not: one version of disorderly conduct is a felony, and both can carry a domestic violence designation. Call Nova Law Group at (480) 405-6767.
Disorderly conduct and criminal damage are among Arizona’s broadest criminal charges. When officers arrive at an argument, a party, a bar, a protest or a domestic call, these are often the statutes used, because the language is broad enough to cover a wide range of confrontations.
That breadth cuts both ways. It means people can get charged for conduct that is not really criminal, raising your voice, refusing to leave fast enough, a shove during an argument nobody was hurt in. It also means these charges are worth testing against each element the State has to prove.
What people do not expect is how serious the consequences can be. One prong of the disorderly conduct statute is a felony. Criminal damage becomes a felony at $1,000 in damage. And both offenses are enumerated in Arizona’s domestic violence statute, which means the right relationship converts an ordinary misdemeanor into a conviction that carries mandatory counseling, firearm consequences and escalating exposure on any future charge.
Most of these cases begin with a call for service rather than with an investigation, and that shapes everything that follows. Officers arrive after the fact and take statements from whoever is still present and willing to talk, so the report can reflect who spoke first, who was calmest, and who was still there. Body-worn video, the 911 audio and the dispatch log can show a different sequence than the written summary. We ask for them early, because retention varies.
A case can begin in either of two ways, and whether anyone was booked into jail does not decide which. An officer can write the complaint, in which case a copy was handed to the person charged and the first court date is printed on it. Or the officer can submit a report to a prosecutor, who then decides whether to charge anything at all; until that decision is made there is no charge and no court date, only a report under review. Being released without paperwork does not mean nothing is coming. It often means the decision has not been made, and that pre-charge window is the point at which having a lawyer involved can do the most.
Which court hears the case depends on the charge and the agency. A misdemeanor from a city police report is generally prosecuted in that city’s municipal court. A report from DPS or the Sheriff’s Office, or from an unincorporated county area, can go to a Maricopa County justice court. Disorderly conduct involving a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, and criminal damage charged at a felony level, are charged by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office and handled in Maricopa County Superior Court in the downtown Phoenix criminal complex, at the Central Court Building, 201 W. Jefferson St., and the South Court Tower, 175 W. Madison St. The charging document names the court.
Unless you have retained a lawyer before your first date, you may end up dealing with the prosecutor on your own. The prosecutor is not your lawyer and is not there to explain the weaknesses in their own case, tell you which count might not survive a motion, or advise you on how a plea could follow you afterward. It is not their job to tell you that the recording does not match the narrative, or how a domestic violence designation could follow you.
Do not assume the court will appoint you a lawyer. Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 6.1(b) entitles an indigent defendant to appointed counsel in a proceeding that may result in punishment by loss of liberty. In misdemeanor court, the prosecutor can avow that no jail will be requested and the judge can rule that no jail will be imposed, and once that happens, there is no right to appointed counsel at all. Arizona’s Court of Appeals upheld exactly that in Campa v. Fleming, 134 Ariz. 330 (App. 1982), on a class 1 misdemeanor carrying up to six months in jail, for a defendant who was on probation and facing immigration consequences.
Avoiding jail is not the same as avoiding a conviction. Depending on the charge and your circumstances, a disorderly conduct or criminal damage conviction can surface in background checks, professional licensing and fingerprint clearance card review, housing applications and immigration review, and where a domestic violence designation attaches, the consequences can extend to firearm questions and to a family court matter running alongside the criminal case.
Arizona’s disorderly conduct statute requires that you acted with intent to disturb the peace or quiet of a neighborhood, family or person, or with knowledge that you were doing so. On top of that intent, the State must prove one of six specific kinds of conduct.
| Conduct | Classification |
|---|---|
| Fighting, violent or seriously disruptive behavior | Class 1 misdemeanor |
| Making unreasonable noise | Class 1 misdemeanor |
| Abusive or offensive language or gestures to a person present, in a manner likely to provoke immediate physical retaliation | Class 1 misdemeanor |
| Protracted commotion intended to prevent the business of a lawful meeting, gathering or procession | Class 1 misdemeanor |
| Refusing a lawful order to disperse issued to maintain public safety near a fire, hazard or emergency | Class 1 misdemeanor |
| Recklessly handling, displaying or discharging a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument | Class 6 felony |
A.R.S. § 13-2904(A) and (B). Current as of July 2026.
That last row is the one that changes the case. Disorderly conduct with a deadly weapon under § 13-2904(A)(6) is a class 6 felony, and it comes up more often than people expect, a firearm displayed during a road rage incident, a gun handled carelessly during an argument, a warning shot. Because it is a class 6 felony, it is also potentially eligible for designation as a class 1 misdemeanor under A.R.S. § 13-604, which is often a central objective in the case.
Note how the mental states work. The intent element attaches to disturbing the peace. The weapon prong requires recklessness as to the handling. Those are two different things, and separating them is often where a defense begins.
Criminal damage covers recklessly defacing or damaging another person’s property, recklessly tampering with property so as to substantially impair its function or value, recklessly damaging utility property, recklessly obstructing livestock’s access to their only available water, graffiti made without the owner’s permission, and intentionally tampering with utility property.
The classification is driven by the dollar amount of the damage.
| Damage amount or circumstance | Classification |
|---|---|
| $10,000 or more | Class 4 felony |
| $5,000 or more to utility property, or intentional tampering with utility property causing an imminent safety hazard | Class 4 felony |
| $2,000 to under $10,000, or damage to promote a criminal street gang or syndicate with intent to intimidate | Class 5 felony |
| $1,000 to under $2,000 | Class 6 felony |
| More than $250 to under $1,000 | Class 1 misdemeanor |
| All other cases | Class 2 misdemeanor |
A.R.S. § 13-1602(B). Current as of July 2026.
Two details worth knowing. Damage to utility property crosses into class 4 felony territory at a lower threshold: $5,000 rather than $10,000. And in graffiti cases charged under subsection (A)(5), the damage figure by statute includes reasonable labor costs, material costs and equipment costs used to abate or repair the damage, which is how a can of spray paint turns into a four-figure loss on a police report.
Certain targets take the offense out of the ordinary statute entirely. Damaging a place of worship, a school or educational facility, a cemetery or mortuary, or utility or agricultural infrastructure for the purpose of obtaining nonferrous metals is aggravated criminal damage. The mental state is broader, intentionally or recklessly: and every tier is a felony. There is no misdemeanor version.
| Damage amount | Worship, school or cemetery | Infrastructure for nonferrous metals |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 or more | Class 4 felony | Class 3 felony |
| $1,500 to under $10,000 | Class 5 felony | Class 4 felony |
| Under $1,500 | Class 6 felony | Class 5 felony |
A.R.S. § 13-1604(B). Current as of July 2026.
Trespass charges often accompany these cases. Under A.R.S. § 13-1504, first degree criminal trespass in or on a critical public service facility is a class 5 felony; entering or remaining unlawfully in a residential structure, or desecrating a religious symbol or religious property, is a class 6 felony; and entering a fenced residential yard, looking into a residence in reckless disregard of the inhabitant’s privacy, or unlawfully entering a mineral claim is a class 1 misdemeanor. Second degree criminal trespass under § 13-1503: entering or remaining unlawfully in a nonresidential structure or fenced commercial yard: is a class 2 misdemeanor.
This is the part that catches people completely off guard. A.R.S. § 13-3601 lists the offenses that can carry a domestic violence designation, and both criminal damage and disorderly conduct are on that list: if the relationship between the parties qualifies. Qualifying relationships include current or former spouses, people who live or have lived together, people with a child in common, a range of blood and in-law relatives, and current or former romantic or sexual relationships.
There is a limit that matters. Criminal damage is enumerated without qualification, so any criminal damage offense can be designated DV. Disorderly conduct is enumerated only as to paragraphs (A)(1), (2), (3) and (6). A disorderly conduct charge pled under (A)(4): protracted commotion at a lawful meeting, or (A)(5), refusing a dispersal order, cannot lawfully carry a domestic violence designation. That is a real, citable point, and it is worth checking against your charging document.
The designation does not change the class of the offense. What it changes is everything around it: officers generally must arrest rather than cite and release where physical injury or a weapon is involved, unless they reasonably believe the victim will be protected; release conditions protecting the alleged victim are mandatory; firearms may be seized at the scene and held; a misdemeanor conviction requires court-ordered domestic violence offender treatment at your expense under § 13-3601.01; and a third qualifying DV offense within 84 months becomes aggravated domestic violence, a class 5 felony with mandatory jail of four months with two priors and eight months with three or more.
We attack the mental state. Disorderly conduct requires intent to disturb the peace or knowledge of doing so. Criminal damage requires recklessness, and aggravated criminal damage requires intent or recklessness. Accidents are not crimes. Neither is being loud in a place where loud is normal. Where a fight is alleged, Arizona’s justification statutes can apply here as they do on an assault case, and your side lands better once a lawyer has reviewed the reports and the video.
We attack the damage figure. A criminal damage case that comes in at $1,050 is a felony; at $950 it is a misdemeanor. The figure that lands in the complaint is often a number the complaining party gave at the scene or a first repair quote rather than a documented cost. Photographs, a second estimate, evidence of pre-existing damage and proof of what the item was worth can all move that number.
We check whether the DV designation is even available. Whether the relationship qualifies under § 13-3601(A)(1) through (6), and which subsection the disorderly conduct is charged under, both control. Getting an unlawful designation removed changes the collateral consequences of the entire case.
We take the weapon prong seriously. A class 6 felony under (A)(6) is a different case from a misdemeanor. Was the weapon actually handled recklessly, or was it lawfully carried and visible? Was there a defensive display privilege? And if a conviction cannot be avoided, is this a case for designation to a class 1 misdemeanor under § 13-604?
We look for the First Amendment problem. The abusive-language prong requires language likely to provoke immediate physical retaliation from a person present. Speech that is merely offensive, insulting or profane: including speech directed at police officers, is not automatically criminal, and courts look closely at charges built on words alone.
We push for diversion and restitution-based resolutions. In property damage cases in particular, a resolution that makes the complaining party whole is sometimes available and can end the case without a conviction.
Nova Law Group was built by Ryan Tait, a former Maricopa County Attorney’s Office felony prosecutor. The practice is criminal defense first. We keep caseloads deliberately low, which means the lawyers on your case have time to actually watch the video and read the reports line by line, and on a disorderly conduct case, where the whole dispute is about context and mental state, watching the full body-worn video rather than reading the summary can change the outcome. We take cases to trial when trial is the right pressure. Most criminal cases are quoted as a flat fee. Consultations are free and confidential.
Usually not. Five of the six prongs of A.R.S. § 13-2904 are class 1 misdemeanors. The exception is subsection (A)(6), recklessly handling, displaying or discharging a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, which is a class 6 felony.
At $1,000. Damage of more than $250 but under $1,000 is a class 1 misdemeanor, $1,000 to under $2,000 is a class 6 felony, $2,000 to under $10,000 is a class 5 felony, and $10,000 or more is a class 4 felony. Utility property crosses into class 4 at $5,000.
Yes, but only when charged under paragraphs (A)(1), (2), (3) or (6) of § 13-2904 and only where a qualifying relationship exists under § 13-3601(A). Charges under (A)(4) or (A)(5) are not eligible for a DV designation.
Offensive or profane speech alone is generally protected. The statute requires language or gestures likely to provoke immediate physical retaliation from a person present, and courts scrutinize charges built on words. Whether a particular case survives that scrutiny depends on the facts.
Paying does not automatically dismiss the charge, but it matters. Restitution paid before the case resolves affects the prosecutor’s view of the case, the court’s view at sentencing, and often the availability of a diversion resolution.
A class 6 felony that is not a dangerous offense may be designated a class 1 misdemeanor under A.R.S. § 13-604, either at sentencing or after successful completion of probation. Whether that is available depends on the facts, the charge and your record, and it is one of the primary objectives we pursue in these cases.
Yes. Recklessly drawing or inscribing a message, slogan, sign or symbol on a building, structure or surface without the owner’s permission is criminal damage under § 13-1602(A)(5), and the damage calculation includes labor, materials and equipment used to clean or repair it, which pushes many graffiti cases past the felony threshold.
No. It is a criminal charge, and most forms of it under A.R.S. § 13-2904 are class 1 misdemeanors, the most serious misdemeanor class in Arizona. A conviction can carry jail exposure, fines, probation terms and collateral consequences, and a domestic violence designation can affect release conditions and firearm questions.
It may be charged as criminal damage under A.R.S. § 13-1602, as disorderly conduct, as assault, or as more than one of those out of the same incident, and where a qualifying relationship exists it can also carry a domestic violence designation. The counts on the complaint govern, not what anyone said at the scene.
No. The decision belongs to the prosecutor, not the complaining witness. A case can go forward on the report, the video and the 911 audio even if the other person stops cooperating. If the incident was tagged as domestic violence, no-contact conditions still apply to you: do not text, email or call anyone named in the paperwork.
It can. Who was identified as the aggressor in a chaotic situation often depends on who was still present when officers arrived and who spoke to them first. Witness names, phone video from other people there, and the venue’s own cameras can change that picture, but they have to be gathered quickly.
On a felony, yes: the right to counsel attaches, and if nobody has been retained by your first court date the court appoints a lawyer for anyone who cannot afford one. In misdemeanor court, often no. Rule 6.1(b) entitles an indigent defendant to appointed counsel where the case may result in loss of liberty, but there the State can take jail off the table by avowing it will not seek it, and once the judge rules that no jail will be imposed, the right to appointed counsel goes away, even on a class 1 misdemeanor and even where a conviction carries real collateral consequences. Campa v. Fleming, 134 Ariz. 330 (App. 1982).
Arizona cases rarely arrive alone. If any of these apply to your situation, or you are not sure which charge you are actually facing, these pages explain what to expect:
From our Google reviews, plus Yelp and Avvo. These are clients’ own words, reproduced from our review profiles.
“These guys are the best attorneys in all of Arizona. It is definitely the most professional group of lawyers… I recommend this firm!”
“Sydney was extremely thorough regarding every single detail of my criminal case… it ultimately resulted in a clear and powerful win for my case.”
“They fought tirelessly for my case and helped me achieve a favorable outcome. Exceptional service and results.”
“The firm provided me with the most professional legal representation possible. Mr. Ryan Tait patiently explained… beyond my expectations.”
“The best law firm that I have ever dealt with. The amount of passion & commitment that they dedicated for my case… truly what separated them from other law firms.”
“Oh my goodness, our lawyer Ryan Tait was amazing. He does what he says he’s going to do. A very patient lawyer… He’s a miracle worker.”
“I was being charged with a few felony counts and facing a few years in prison… I made the best choice of my life calling this law firm.”
“…they reached out to one of their attorneys and confirmed my suspicions; I’ve been worried this whole time about criminal charges, they put my fears to rest. HIGHLY recommend them.”
“Helpful and clear direction in a time of uncertainty. Highly recommended.”
“Ryan Tait was amazing and really helpful. I would recommend him.”
“If you’re looking for a law group that truly cares about you and makes a difficult situation less stressful, these are your people… Alexis was my lawyer, and she was truly heaven-sent.”
“Alexis Brooks was my lawyer… She was extremely professional yet down to earth and always made me feel at ease and confident in my case. I would definitely recommend her for anyone that needs an excellent defense attorney.”
“Spectacular representation! Sydney was very compassionate, diligent and professional. I can’t recommend enough.”
“…Ryan and his team are kind, understanding, and very good listeners. Each member of his team was well educated, knowledgable and very professional.”
“We hired Mr. Tait to handle a legal affair for a member of our family. It was a complex criminal case that required over two years of work! Through the entire effort, Mr. Tait kept us informed…”
“My family hired Ryan Tait to fight for my family member… He went over all the pros and cons. He answered all our questions and calls. He knows what he is doing.”
“Ryan is absolutely awesome and professional. He gave me all detailed advice I needed. He is nice and patient. I definitely recommend Ryan and his law firm!”
“Very good at what they do… they were always on top of everything didn’t really have to do much they took care of everything…”
“These guys are great!! They did a great job on my case, super consistent and helpful. Definitely will recommend them to anyone.”
“Excellent lawyers… and their honesty, and they helped me even though I do not live in Arizona.”
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
De nuestras reseñas en Google, además de Yelp y Avvo. Son las palabras de nuestros clientes, tomadas de nuestros perfiles de reseñas y traducidas del inglés.
“Son los mejores abogados de todo Arizona. Sin duda es el grupo de abogados más profesional… ¡Recomiendo esta firma!”
“Sydney fue sumamente minuciosa con cada detalle de mi caso penal… al final, eso resultó en una victoria clara y contundente para mi caso.”
“Lucharon incansablemente por mi caso y me ayudaron a lograr un resultado favorable. Servicio y resultados excepcionales.”
“La firma me brindó la representación legal más profesional posible. El Sr. Ryan Tait me explicó con paciencia… más allá de mis expectativas.”
“La mejor firma de abogados con la que he tratado. La pasión y el compromiso que dedicaron a mi caso… es lo que realmente los distinguió de otras firmas.”
“¡Dios mío, nuestro abogado Ryan Tait fue increíble! Cumple lo que dice que va a hacer. Un abogado muy paciente… Hace milagros.”
“Me acusaban de varios cargos por delitos graves y me enfrentaba a unos años de prisión… Tomé la mejor decisión de mi vida al llamar a esta firma.”
“…se comunicaron con uno de sus abogados y confirmaron mis sospechas; había estado preocupado todo este tiempo por posibles cargos penales, y calmaron mis temores. Los recomiendo MUCHÍSIMO.”
“Orientación útil y clara en un momento de incertidumbre. Muy recomendables.”
“Ryan Tait fue increíble y de gran ayuda. Lo recomendaría.”
“Si busca un despacho que de verdad se preocupe por usted y haga que una situación difícil sea menos estresante, esta es su gente… Alexis fue mi abogada, y fue una verdadera bendición.”
“Alexis Brooks fue mi abogada… Fue sumamente profesional y a la vez sencilla, y siempre me hizo sentir tranquilo y seguro con mi caso. Sin duda la recomendaría a cualquiera que necesite una excelente abogada defensora.”
“¡Representación espectacular! Sydney fue muy compasiva, diligente y profesional. No puedo recomendarla lo suficiente.”
“…Ryan y su equipo son amables, comprensivos y saben escuchar. Cada miembro de su equipo demostró estar bien preparado, con conocimiento y gran profesionalismo.”
“Contratamos al Sr. Tait para encargarse de un asunto legal de un miembro de nuestra familia. Fue un caso penal complejo que requirió más de dos años de trabajo. Durante todo el proceso, el Sr. Tait nos mantuvo informados…”
“Mi familia contrató a Ryan Tait para luchar por un familiar… Nos explicó todos los pros y los contras. Respondió todas nuestras preguntas y llamadas. Sabe lo que hace.”
“Ryan es absolutamente increíble y profesional. Me dio todos los consejos detallados que necesitaba. Es amable y paciente. ¡Sin duda recomiendo a Ryan y a su bufete!”
“Muy buenos en lo que hacen… siempre estuvieron al tanto de todo; casi no tuve que hacer nada, ellos se encargaron de todo…”
“¡Son excelentes! Hicieron un gran trabajo en mi caso, muy constantes y serviciales. Sin duda los recomendaré a cualquiera.”
“Excelentes abogados… y su honestidad y eso que me ayudaron que yo no vivo en Arizona”
Los resultados anteriores no garantizan un resultado similar.
If you have been arrested, charged, or contacted by a detective, the decisions you make in the first few days matter. Nova Law Group defends misdemeanor and felony cases in the Superior Court and in municipal and justice courts across Maricopa County.
Free, confidential consultation: (480) 405-6767
Prefer not to call? Send us your case details and a member of our team will follow up with you.
Maricopa County courts
Our office: Nova Law Group, PLLC, 4455 E. Camelback Rd., Suite C250, Phoenix, AZ 85018. Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., by appointment. Directions ↗
Si lo arrestaron, lo acusaron o un detective lo contactó, las decisiones que tome en los primeros días importan. Nova Law Group defiende casos de delitos menores y graves en la Corte Superior y en las cortes municipales y de justicia de todo el condado de Maricopa.
Consulta gratuita y confidencial: (480) 405-6767
¿Prefiere no llamar? Envíenos los detalles de su caso y un miembro de nuestro equipo se comunicará con usted.
Cortes del condado de Maricopa
Nuestra oficina: Nova Law Group, PLLC, 4455 E. Camelback Rd., Suite C250, Phoenix, AZ 85018. De lunes a viernes, de 8:00 a.m. a 6:00 p.m., con cita previa. Cómo llegar ↗
RecognitionReconocimientos


























Awards and ratings reflect the standards of the organizations that issue them. They do not predict the outcome of any case.Los premios y las calificaciones reflejan los criterios de las organizaciones que los otorgan. No predicen el resultado de ningún caso.